Archive for March, 2010

More Writedown News

Friday, March 12th, 2010

I’ve spent the last several days discussing how government actions could potentially cause banks to write down the values of two significant asset categories: commercial real estate loans and home equity loans.  The thing is, those writedowns have not occured.  Because of accounting rule changes last year, the banks are able to keep many of the assets marked at relatively high levels, even though, as Congressman Frank indelicately said, they “have no real economic value”.

The thing is, while the assets may be marked-to-make-believe, there is an interesting provision in many mortgage derivatives based on those assets that causes the derivatives to experience losses, even though assets have not dropped in value.  It’s called ”implied writedown”.  Basically what it means is that even though the asset itself hasn’t been written down for whatever reason, the derivative based on the asset behaves as if it was written down.

What’s new news on this is the fact that implied writedowns have finally hit the AAA-rated home-equity-based derivatives!  Seems as though the derivatives are realizing what’s going on in the real world even if the banks holding the actual assets are valuing their holdings at unrealistic levels.  For instance … and remember, this is what’s in the AAA-rated bond … also remember, even Berkshire Hathaway is not considered safe enough to warrant a AAA rating … one of the loan packages upon which the AAA derivative is based “has almost 65% of collateral more than 60 days delinquent, and almost 23% of those have already been foreclosed.”  Yikes!!

For the full story, read the article at FT Alphaville, which has been all over the writedown stories.

– Don

More Mark-To-Market News

Thursday, March 11th, 2010

A few days ago, I wrote about how actions by the FDIC may end up forcing banks to write down CRE loans that were valued much higher than reality.  Well yesterday, Barney Frank asked the big money center banks to write down the value of their home equity loans so that the government can help facilitate the first mortgage liens to be either modified or have their principle reduced.

The thing is, as Congressman Frank pointed out, the banks are not carrying many of these loans at their real economic value.  Because the mark-to-market rules were eliminated, the banks have been carrying them at about 87 cents on the dollar.  But that is nowhere close to reality.

Here’s the consequence of that false reality.  By keeping the loans at elevated marks, the banks’ capital was preserved.  If they now had to write down the value of these loans to what they were truly worth, it would wipe out billions in assets.  It would pretty much torch all that capital they raised last year.  So that TARP money that they proudly paid back (to get their compensation back to where they wanted) … the banks were only able to do that because they weren’t recognizing the losses that had actually piled up.

To a trader, it would be like having a leveraged position that completely blows up, holding on to the position till the price recovers, and not worrying a bit.  Because you get to decide what the price is for margin calculation purposes.  That means you never have to meet a margin call so you can hold on to the position for as long as it takes for you to recoup your losses. Nice gig, if you can get it.

Lots of things are transpiring that may force banks to face reality.

– Don

Ratings Agencies and Tobacco Companies

Wednesday, March 10th, 2010

Back in June 2009, I compared the ratings agencies to tobacco companies.  Be sure to read the whole thing, because it shows just how similar the behavior of ratings agencies were to the cigarette market.

Those similarities keep getting stronger.  Today, the politician who led the drive against the tobacco companies, Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal, sued the ratings agencies.

– Don