Archive for January, 2010

GDP and Employment

Friday, January 29th, 2010

Just a quick update.

The last time GDP grew this much in one quarter was the 4th quarter in 2003.  Employment during that period grew 345,000 jobs.

On the other hand, the recession that preceded that 2003 growth spurt – the recession that officially lasted from March 2001 to November 2001 – ended with non-farm payrolls at 130,901,000.  At the end of that GDP boom during the 4th quarter of 2003, non-farm payrolls stood at 130,270,000.  That’s a HUGE DECLINE.  In other words, once the recession officially ended, the economy continued to lose a lot of jobs.  So a rebound in GDP with continuing job losses is not unprecedented.

In fact, the exact same thing happened after the 1990 recession too.

Those two recessions, however, are unique.  For all other post-WWII recessions, job losses stopped and job gains came within a month or two preceding or immediately after the end of the recession.

– Don

Huge GDP Surprise … During A Period When Joblessness Continued Upward

Friday, January 29th, 2010

This morning’s GDP report provoked a question.  And after all the reading I’ve done, it doesn’t seem that anyone is asking it, at least not yet.

What does it mean when GDP grows at 5.7% and the economy still sheds over 200,000 jobs?  Is this the typical way a recession ends — GDP grows first while joblessness still increases?

I’ll do a little digging and report back.  I’m sure the answer isn’t too hard to find.

– Don

How’s This For An Interesting Juxtaposition

Thursday, January 28th, 2010

From the maintainers of one of the most impressive stock market databases around, Bespoke Investment Group:

Can’t Blame Earnings Season

The earnings picture continues to look impressive. Heading into the close yesterday, the earnings beat rate (% of companies beating EPS estimates) stood at 71%, which is high in its own right. Last night and this morning, another 64 companies reported earnings, taking the total number of US companies that have reported since earnings season began up to 223. As shown below, the earnings beat rate now stands at 73.5%, which would mark the highest reading for any quarter since at least 1999 if the reporting period ended today.

Can’t blame the positive earnings surprises?  Actually, maybe you can!

From CXO Advisory group, comes a summary of the research paper titled Aggregate Market Reaction to Earnings Announcements:

Earnings Surprises and Future Stock Market Returns

However, positive surprises in aggregate earnings indicate downward future movements in aggregate market value, concentrated in the days immediately surrounding earnings releases.

Positive surprises indicate downward movement for the market?  That’s interesting, and obviously unexpected.

– Don